Today's hottest deals

MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '20 at 18:25
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 149
2-Core 282
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 855
87% 706 Pts
64-Core 1,074
66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Sapphire(1DA2 E426) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 77% Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 2 499GB
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 714 256 145 146 147 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 367
Write 628
Mixed 388
SusWrite 259
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 31.4
130% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 514
DQ Mixed 154
170% 275 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 286%
Amd-raid SAMSUNG HD502IJ 500GB
201GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 42 29 26 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 71.5
Write 54.2
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 40.1
39% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3733 C17 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 38
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 36.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550-A PRO (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 10,148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $712
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback