Apple MacBookAir7,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookAir7,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937CB26E2E02BB01
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '20 at 17:16
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 134
58% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 197
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 011B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.72% Terrible
Lighting 9.47
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 10.1
8% 9.03 fps
MRender 7.67
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 12.2
8% 9.04 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.72%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0128G PCIe 121GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXZ33A0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,116
Write 606
Mixed 544
166% 755 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 31.1
114% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 454
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 402
287% 371 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 220%
APPLE SD Card Reader 250GB
199GB free, PID 8406
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 46 48 48 50 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 82.8
Write 24.6
Mixed 43.1
SusWrite 45.5
59% 49 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 6.1
468% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.2% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 14.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookAir7,2 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir7,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback