Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	25.5% Poor	Memory 35.5 1-Core 43.8 2-Core 88.6 32% 56 Pts	4-Core 92.3 8-Core 83 12% 87.7 Pts	64-Core 88.1 6% 88.1 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C808) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.2% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 2.12 2% 2.37 fps	MRender 3.81 Gravity 2.07 Splatting 5.35 3% 3.74 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.2% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SMI USB DISK 34GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 29GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 21 22 23 23 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 2 Write 21.7 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 21.2 19% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 2.4 258% 3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1GB 2,355 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 5.5 14% 5 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 0.5 5% 1.87 GB/s	Latency 224 18% 224 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	6x
Pentium Silver N5000IntelBench 34%, 12,140 samples	5x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	6x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	5x

SSD
SD9SN8W128G1004 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 32 samples	4x
WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TBWDCBench 96%, 39,874 samples	2x
NT-256 256GBBench 72%, 1,342 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x1GBABCDBench 18%, 2,355 samples	11x