Today's hottest deals

Asus K56CM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus K56CM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K56CM
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120821
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 28 '17 at 15:09
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 108
56% 87.9 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 169
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 635M
Asus(1043 1587) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7878
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
3% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 3.35
Parallax 1.84
3% 2.9 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 2.91
3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 71.6
Write 81.2
Mixed 27.7
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.22
54% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 075D GR1600S364L11S/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K56CM Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K56CM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback