Today's hottest deals

Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '17 at 08:32
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 245
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 84.8
46% 69.4 Pts
4-Core 84.8
8-Core 85.4
11% 85.1 Pts
64-Core 85.8
5% 85.8 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1650 Series
Sapphire(174B E140) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 0.91
2% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Galaxy G X0240ML105-G 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.3% Above average
Read 260
Write 184
Mixed 208
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 15.3
87% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 37.7
50% 91 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 76%
ASMT 2105 240GB
196GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 29.3
Write 27.6
Mixed 28.2
36% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.14
4K Write 4.47
4K Mixed 2.58
259% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-033.A00LF 9905403-518.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.3% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.2
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback