Biostar G41-M7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar G41-M7  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '20 at 18:16
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5440
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 33.1
2-Core 67.2
37% 55 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 137
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 3.53
4% 4.29 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.33
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.44 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800BD-22MRA1 80GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 23 30 22 33 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 4.3
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 25.3
15% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 33%
TOSHIBA External USB3.0 500GB
25GB free, PID 3920
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 24 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 25.8
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 25.3
35% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41-M7 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar G41-M7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback