Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 156 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 495 50% 403 Pts	64-Core 1,220 76% 1,220 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84F6) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.42% Terrible	Lighting 4.17 Reflection 5.04 Parallax 3.41 3% 4.2 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 4.27 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.42% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Galax TA1D0120A 120GB 4,895 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 69 69 71 72 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 460 Write 231 Mixed 327 SusWrite 98 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 28.5 112% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 192 166% 244 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KHX2400C15D4/4G 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.5% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 9.5 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 11.4 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

SSD
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	46x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	45x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x

RAM
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	231x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	134x
Atermiter 2x16GBUnknownBench 65%, 839 samples	89x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $130

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16