Today's hottest deals

MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A63
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '20 at 04:49
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 221
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 604
64% 510 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.3% Excellent
Lighting 99.9
Reflection 107
Parallax 104
81% 104 fps
MRender 97
Gravity 95.4
Splatting 94.5
78% 95.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 203 9.8 80 37 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 486
Write 370
Mixed 371
SusWrite 104
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 0.5
72% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 3.7
DQ Mixed 47.4
43% 71.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$36
67GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 83 82 81 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 51.3
Write 55.8
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 82.2
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 62%
Seagate BUP BL 4TB
664GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 41 41 40 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 33.8
Write 34.7
Mixed 34
SusWrite 39.9
26% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$55
193GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 65 64 63 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 69
Write 65.7
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 63.9
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
768GB free, PID 0577
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6.9 6.9 7 6.9 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.81% Terrible
Read 36.5
Write 6.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 6.9
16% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 19%
WD 6400AAK External 640GB
586GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 41 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 38.8
Write 37.2
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 40.6
51% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 22%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
91GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 119 101 118 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 78.5
Write 63.7
Mixed 59
SusWrite 116
109% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
40% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 65%
ST1000VM 002-1ET162 1TB
931GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 39 38 38 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 35
Write 36.5
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 38.2
48% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.5% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) Builds (Compare 5,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $676
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback