HP ProBook 470 G0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 470 G0  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1948
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '20 at 20:04
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Memory 14.3
1-Core 11.3
2-Core 26.1
10% 17.2 Pts
4-Core 43.2
8-Core 38.2
6% 40.7 Pts
64-Core 34
2% 34 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1029A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 6.5 3.9 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 318
Write 5.7
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 9.2
18% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
40% 8.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$85
94GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 71 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 58.4
Write 48.3
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 69.4
38% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 63%
Intenso Ultra Line 256GB
239GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 0.1 13 6.3 19 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.83% Terrible
Read 31
Write 9.7
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 10
20% 17 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
31% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.83%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT351S6CFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 365
11% 365 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 470 G0 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 470 G0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback