Medion P6689 MD60572

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics4.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMedion P6689 MD60572  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION E15KRR
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 18 '20 at 13:54
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 97%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 24.9
2-Core 35.9
14% 30.4 Pts
4-Core 61.2
8-Core 92.4
10% 76.8 Pts
64-Core 14
1% 14 Pts
Poor: 26% Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1B0A 22C4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7989
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.46% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 4.5
4% 10.1 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 9.43
5% 6.05 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.46%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
679GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 10 9.9 8.8 12 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
1.43% Terrible
Read 6.9
Write 12.2
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 14.6
5% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
1% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 99%
Liteon CV1-DB256 256GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GD86201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 26 16 5.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
Read 147
Write 38.2
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 28
51% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2
483% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4
13% 4.57 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.7
5% 1.9 GB/s
Latency 1,393
3% 1,393 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6689 MD60572 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Medion P6689 MD60572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $72
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback