Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131215
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 12:24
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 85.5
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 119
57% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 195
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
AMD(1002 9904) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 7.73
Parallax 4.56
4% 5.9 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 8.09
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X212 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 508
Write 413
Mixed 405
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 2.13
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 25.3
63% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 62.8
85% 157 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 114%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 143
Write 95.3
Mixed 99.2
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.27
4K Mixed 0.28
109% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 83%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
512GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 178
Write 111
Mixed 124
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.49
100% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 85%
HitachiG ST 256GB
203GB free, PID 1014
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 156
Mixed 131
193% 154 MB/s
4K Read 7.77
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 7.01
1,571% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 9.28
DQ Write 51.4
DQ Mixed 7.69
2,044% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 179%
Great: 179%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1866G 2O 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
38.1% Below average
MC Read 18
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 14
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A75M-D3H Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback