Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LE  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '20 at 02:15
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 186
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 361
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.3% Average
Lighting 46.9
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 64.2
38% 58.6 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 49.2
Splatting 52.4
44% 54.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.2.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 137 138 137 136 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62% Good
Read 375
Write 161
Mixed 207
SusWrite 137
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 28.8
100% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 158
122% 166 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
466GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 126 126 125 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 126
Write 120
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 125
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M LE Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback