Today's hottest deals

AMI Intel

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAMI Intel  (all builds)
MotherboardAMI Intel
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '20 at 05:51
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 42.7
1-Core 52.2
2-Core 104
38% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 201
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.58% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 2.41
2% 2.81 fps
MRender 4.48
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 6.35
4% 4.41 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.58%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 500 466 471 485 486 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 558
Write 474
Mixed 490
SusWrite 480
113% 501 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 37
139% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 350
257% 337 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 109%
Great: 276%
SSD128GBS800 128GB
59GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 35 40 30 30 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 385
Write 71.8
Mixed 117
SusWrite 36
33% 152 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 1
38% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 33.8
DQ Mixed 19
29% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
26.1% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: AMI Intel

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback