Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive480% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 06 '20 at 10:49
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 83.5
1-Core 156
2-Core 313
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1,207
107% 909 Pts
64-Core 2,882
178% 2,882 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 54.6
Reflection 63
Parallax 51.2
44% 56.2 fps
MRender 78
Gravity 54.6
Splatting 71.2
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Viper M.2 VP4100 1TB
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3934 4006 4018 4032 4039 4022 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
480% Outstanding
Read 2,134
Write 3743
Mixed 2,294
SusWrite 4,008
693% 3,045 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 87.9
301% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,418
DQ Write 1,130
DQ Mixed 1300
966% 1,283 MB/s
Poor: 186%
This bench: 480%
Great: 492%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$122
476GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1476 1473 1470 1466 1466 1473 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,369
Write 1,466
Mixed 948
SusWrite 1,471
348% 1,563 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 70.3
243% 88 MB/s
DQ Read 1,316
DQ Write 1,345
DQ Mixed 1,170
924% 1,277 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 319%
Great: 353%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$55
2TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 191 189 190 191 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 150
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 189
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
USB Devi Device 4GB
4GB free, PID 0111
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.4 5.3 5.4 5.1 5.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.93% Terrible
Read 11
Write 3.7
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 5.2
6% 5.65 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Genesys SD USB3 Reader 64GB
37GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 31 25 31 27 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.6% Poor
Read 70.8
Write 11.2
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 28
36% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
66% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 36.4
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 34.6
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $979
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback