Dell Latitude D630

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude D630  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0WM416
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '20 at 03:19
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7250-$97
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.27% Terrible
Memory 8.92
1-Core 23.6
2-Core 43.4
13% 25.3 Pts
4-Core 44.3
8-Core 42.9
6% 43.6 Pts
64-Core 44
3% 44 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 8.27%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 135M
Dell(1028 01F9) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.34% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 0.73
Parallax 0.12
0% 0.41 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.13
0% 0.58 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.34%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100V 1TB
495GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 24 16 13 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 15.9
Write 68.7
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 23.3
24% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
75% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 63%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
613GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.9 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 19.4
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 10.3
25% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 20%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB
28GB free, PID 00ed
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 6.5 5.9 6.9 6.1 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 12.5
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 6
15% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 25%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID c08a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 7.1 10 8 7.2 6.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.2% Terrible
Read 28.4
Write 6.2
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 7.6
17% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
87% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.2%
Great: 7%
WDC WD12 00VE-00KWT0 120GB
111GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 25.4
Write 15.4
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 10.9
22% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 17%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
1TB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2 1.3 1.7 1.7 2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
9.15% Terrible
Read 27.6
Write 21.4
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 1.8
23% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 414
10% 414 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 12%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude D630 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude D630

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $306
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback