Today's hottest deals

Asus CM6870

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CM6870  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6870
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '20 at 00:33
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 478
52% 413 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.2% Good
Lighting 79.5
Reflection 73.4
Parallax 71.2
65% 74.7 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 71
Splatting 54
51% 63.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 131 43 48 54 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 350
Write 332
Mixed 249
SusWrite 95.4
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 6
70% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 96.6
DQ Mixed 35.8
35% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
276GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 78 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 85.7
Write 83.9
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 76.9
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
534GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 22.6
Write 23.6
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 17.3
16% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 67%
Seagate Desktop 1.5TB
941GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.87% Terrible
Read 28.1
Write 25.4
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 15.6
27% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.87%
Great: 20%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
869GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 71 71 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 84.6
Write 76.9
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 71.3
99% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
224% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback