Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130910
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '14 at 03:01
Run Duration443 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 100
2-Core 196
67% 148 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 362
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 54% Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3345
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC064MAG 64GB
60GB free
Firmware: 0006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 324
Write 74.4
Mixed 121
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 4.16
79% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 58.8
DQ Mixed 4.16
15% 31 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 53%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
681GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 141
Write 142
Mixed 132
104% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.18
79% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40
147GB free
Firmware: K2AO Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 46.3
Write 36.8
Mixed 41.3
31% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.28
92% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24%
Great: 34%
I-O DATA HDCR-U 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 012e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.36% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 13.7
Mixed 16.3
21% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.15
19% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 7.36%
Great: 18%
I-O DATA HDCA-U 2TB
540GB free, PID 0139
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 21.3
Write 14.6
Mixed 17.3
22% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 3.72
4K Mixed 0.33
140% 1.59 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 22%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB
172GB free, PID 00a8
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.9% Very poor
Read 20.9
Write 14.5
Mixed 17.3
22% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.32
64% 0.77 MB/s
I-O DATA HDJ-U 2TB
167GB free, PID 0134
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.75% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 14.5
Mixed 17.3
22% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.35
50% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.75%
Great: 18%
Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback