Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '20 at 04:30
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 186
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 490
51% 409 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 46.1
46% 52.2 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 49.2
38% 46.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT09B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 63 62 64 65 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50% Average
Read 227
Write 192
Mixed 140
SusWrite 61.9
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 24.8
94% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 58.5
79% 144 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 50%
Great: 89%
Intel SSDSA2CW600G3 480GB
184GB free
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 208 214 215 209 204 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 247
Write 216
Mixed 190
SusWrite 204
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 24.3
79% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 80.9
DQ Mixed 76.7
66% 98.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 53%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
315GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 68 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 71
Write 41
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 70.5
42% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 43%
ST350063 0AS 500GB
465GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 17.8
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 25.8
31% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 30.1
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback