Today's hottest deals

Asus CM1740

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus CM1740  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM1740
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '20 at 15:09
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3620 APU
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
45% Average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 36.9
2-Core 72.2
40% 60.2 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 122
15% 115 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 3.03
3% 3.91 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.09
3% 3.91 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 36 23 26 55 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 87.7
Write 75.5
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 34.8
53% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata EL64C1C1624Z1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.2% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.6
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM1740 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM1740

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback