MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 28 '20 at 22:35
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 67.5
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
90% 172 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 823
87% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,075
66% 1,075 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3825 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 132
Parallax 137
115% 137 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 126
Splatting 110
114% 144 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 112%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$53
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1424 1453 1445 682 1581 951 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2,451
Write 1,561
Mixed 234
SusWrite 1,256
304% 1,376 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 84.6
288% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 478
456% 705 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 301%
Great: 311%
Sandisk S-2T00 2TB
816GB free
Firmware: 411040RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 441 448 448 451 449 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 420
Mixed 326
SusWrite 447
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 30
142% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 120%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
950GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 178 183 183 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 120
Write 167
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 180
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
43% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 106%
External USB3.0 DISK00 750GB
556GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 63 64 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 91.2
Write 91.5
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 63.8
102% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 35%
WD My Passport 0741 1TB
645GB free, PID 0741
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 37.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 39.1
48% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 44%
External USB3.0 DISK01 500GB
416GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 64 65 64 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 70.3
Write 67.6
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 64.5
86% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.8% Good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 27.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 27.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $966
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback