Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 07:30
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 81.1
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 826
78% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,062
66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Lighting 73.9
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 87.2
60% 76 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 58.5
54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OASDX-512G 512GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 182 121 98 21 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 413
Write 343
Mixed 332
SusWrite 116
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 1
51% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 18.3
DQ Mixed 1.4
22% 55.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 78%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB
461GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2349 824 827 826 826 827 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 66% Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$46
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 33.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 32.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,008
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback