Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181104
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 26 '20 at 23:00
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 218
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 460
61% 460 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.3% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 74.3
Parallax 64
56% 69 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 68.4
57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P180831a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 125 126 127 127 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66% Good
Read 415
Write 128
Mixed 180
SusWrite 124
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 26.4
121% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 111
86% 117 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
646GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 182 182 184 184 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 148
Mixed 81
SusWrite 181
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2400C16N2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback