Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V GENE (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '20 at 06:30
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95 10,699 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 95 1-Core 116 2-Core 230 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 421 8-Core 570 63% 495 Pts	64-Core 568 35% 568 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Zotac(19DA 1476) 2GB CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 17 Parallax 20.2 17% 19.4 fps	MRender 20 Gravity 20.4 Splatting 22 17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0628A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 197 76 75 52 60 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
WD WD20NPVZ-00W 2TB 734 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 85 89 91 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 96.3 Write 93.9 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 89.7 61% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 62%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 930GB free, PID 022e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 96 96 96 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 95.6 Write 94.8 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 95.1 107% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 28,461 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	62.2% Good	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 19.4 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 20.4 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 57.1 70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	331x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	189x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	88x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	45x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	29x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	23x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16