Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170717
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '20 at 03:04
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 118
48% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 199
23% 179 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 1E20) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Lighting 8.07
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 10.9
7% 9.54 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 8.87
Splatting 6.3
5% 6.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
768GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 58 93 102 116 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 160
Write 151
Mixed 105
SusWrite 94.5
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73%
Great: 109%
TDKMedia Gold Flash 16GB
13GB free, PID 048a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.7 3.3 6.1 7.7 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Read 8.5
Write 6.2
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 4.8
8% 6.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
38% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 1067 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.3% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback