Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 3302F1F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3302F1F  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '20 at 22:06
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$92
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 127
54% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 225
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84B5) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 16
Parallax 17
16% 17.5 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 19
Splatting 17
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000L1 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 150 149 152 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 464
Write 153
Mixed 183
SusWrite 150
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 27.3
99% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 186
160% 243 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 88%
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
176GB free
Firmware: CP100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 68
Write 75.1
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 74.1
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 45%
USB3.0 2TB
828GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 19.1
Mixed 25
SusWrite 14.2
17% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 104%
USB3.0 2TB
762GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 24
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 14.2
18% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 029E CM3X2G1333C9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 029E CM3X2G1333C9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3302F1F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3302F1F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback