Asus P5VD2-MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5VD2-MX  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '20 at 08:47
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron E1200
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
28.4% Poor
Memory 51.1
1-Core 18
2-Core 36.2
25% 35.1 Pts
4-Core 36.1
8-Core 36.4
5% 36.2 Pts
64-Core 36.7
2% 36.7 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380011A 80GB-$43
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 44 42 44 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 45.8
Write 44.2
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 43.3
31% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 30%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power 16GB
7GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 0.8
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.9
1% 0.75 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
18% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
1024, 512 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
8.64% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 1.8
7% 2.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 2.3
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.64%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5VD2-MX Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5VD2-MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $230
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback