Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics82.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '20 at 07:05
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 278
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 801
81% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3508 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 90.8
Parallax 78
84% 90.7 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 94.6
Splatting 84.4
80% 99.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1213 1344 1480 1305 1374 1461 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,495
Write 1,377
Mixed 1,003
SusWrite 1,363
294% 1,310 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 64.7
217% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 1,001
DQ Write 773
DQ Mixed 639
545% 804 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 250%
Great: 235%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
407GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 442 460 460 440 360 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 452
Mixed 438
SusWrite 436
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 60.5
198% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 118%
Great: 129%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 61 88 88 88 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 178
Write 186
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 83.6
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
330GB free
Firmware: SE0OA4H0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 93 94 90 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 100
Write 109
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 92.2
59% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 60%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 500GB
423GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 58 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 159
Write 163
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 83.6
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
167% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 70%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
7GB free, PID 0251
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
8.54% Terrible
Read 21.6
Write 20.2
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 19.7
28% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.4
65% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 8.54%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 41
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 39
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $785
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback