PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 (all builds) |
Memory | 14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20130417 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Jul 16 '20 at 15:55 |
Run Duration | 197 Seconds |
Run User | LVA-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-2320-$165
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2320 CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
73.5%
Very good
|
65% 110 Pts
|
44% 326 Pts
|
17% 280 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.48
|
16%
Very poor
|
15% 17.2 fps
|
17% 21.5 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() WD Green 500GB (2012)
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
|
38% 51.9 MB/s
|
30% 0.33 MB/s
|
||
![]() |
50% 66.3 MB/s
|
183% 1.33 MB/s
|
||
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
660GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 54 43 35 27 17 MB/s
|
45%
Average
|
59% 80.3 MB/s
|
136% 0.9 MB/s
|
|
![]() JetFlash Transcend 64GB
32GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
25% 21.8 MB/s
|
90% 1.87 MB/s
|
||
![]() Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
1TB free, PID 1231
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 27 28 28 MB/s
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
38% 28.3 MB/s
|
70% 0.87 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.2%
Above average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
61% 65.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 252x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 223x |
Core i3-3220Intel $60Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 175x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 310x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 294x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 136x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $156 |