Asus P7H57D-V EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P7H57D-V EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 14 '20 at 09:33
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 81.2
2-Core 162
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 398
42% 335 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 60.2
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 57.9
49% 61 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 52.8
49% 61.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 229 260 167 124 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 475
Write 437
Mixed 367
SusWrite 170
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 34.3
120% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 283
223% 311 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 304 333 332 327 337 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$33
888GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 117 118 118 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 130
Write 112
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 118
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
2TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 52 57 52 51 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 109
Write 135
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 52.2
127% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39%
Great: 49%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
28GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 20 19 18 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 128
Write 57.6
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 26.1
85% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.2
221% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 38%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID fc77
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 72 58 65 69 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.8% Average
Read 193
Write 137
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 65.2
149% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H57D-V EVO Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H57D-V EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $306
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback