PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P7H57D-V EVO (all builds) |
Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120928 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | Jul 14 '20 at 09:33 |
Run Duration | 187 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
69.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 229 260 167 124 76 MB/s
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 304 333 332 327 337 MB/s
|
||||
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$33
888GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 117 118 118 119 MB/s
|
71.2%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 2TB
2TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 52 57 52 51 55 MB/s
|
39%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
28GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 20 19 18 18 MB/s
|
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID fc77
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 72 58 65 69 64 MB/s
|
46.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 37x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 32x |
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 30x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 15x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 9x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $291Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $306 |