Today's hottest deals

Asus P5QPL-VM EPU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive8.92% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5QPL-VM EPU  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100317
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateJul 14 '20 at 09:32
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 39.5
2-Core 71.6
36% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 63
8-Core 75
9% 69 Pts
64-Core 46.6
3% 46.6 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Asus(1043 836D) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.35% Terrible
Lighting 0.17
Reflection 0.54
Parallax 0.59
0% 0.43 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 1.57
1% 0.84 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.35%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV100S264G 64GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D110225a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 19 4.1 20 24 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.92% Terrible
Read 104
Write 66.9
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 20.8
14% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 3.3
11% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.92%
Great: 30%
Seagate NAS HDD 2TB-$98
489GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 113 119 113 118 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
63% Good
Read 103
Write 113
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 116
70% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 4.5
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 2.1
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5QPL-VM EPU Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QPL-VM EPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback