Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 14:20
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 73
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 759
75% 614 Pts
64-Core 1,231
76% 1,231 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 184
Parallax 195
143% 185 fps
MRender 223
Gravity 183
Splatting 127
140% 178 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 134%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 43 47 45 46 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 478
Write 469
Mixed 307
SusWrite 79.5
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 44.2
152% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 177
186% 306 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 108%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
83GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 782 588 560 542 516 487 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,286
Write 1,140
Mixed 1,070
SusWrite 579
228% 1,019 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 67.1
220% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 884
DQ Write 838
DQ Mixed 864
648% 862 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 194%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
326GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1748 1529 1513 1492 1450 1351 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,340
Write 2,136
Mixed 1,786
SusWrite 1,514
436% 1,944 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 71.6
234% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 866
DQ Write 718
DQ Mixed 837
614% 807 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 294%
Great: 410%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 141 144 145 145 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 156
Write 144
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 144
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZRX F4-3200C16-8GTZR 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.1% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $950
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback