HP EliteBook 2570p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 2570p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 17DF
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180730
Uptime13.5 Days
Run DateJul 12 '20 at 02:46
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 137
60% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 181
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 17DF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 3.12
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8
4% 5.05 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5000RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 402
Write 290
Mixed 267
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 14.9
55% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 65.5
DQ Mixed 44
45% 74.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 56%
ST325082 3A 250GB
6GB free, PID 007e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 9.5
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 24.1
24% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 15%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$11
40GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 8.1 14 14 9.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 82.5
Write 35
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 12.4
35% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.6% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 2570p Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2570p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback