Asus GL703VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus GL703VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL703VD
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '20 at 21:25
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 221
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 602
60% 488 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1BC0) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 25
Parallax 30.9
27% 29.6 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 22.7
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 114 111 112 110 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 381
Write 47.5
Mixed 136
SusWrite 112
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 11.4
59% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 96.7
DQ Mixed 97.2
102% 174 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 70%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
875GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 106 104 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 108
Write 31.7
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 104
48% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 75%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
173GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 11 11 12 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 131
Write 10.7
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 13
39% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23%
Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
339GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.8 2.7 4 6.6 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 145
Write 6.5
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 4.2
35% 43 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 859B CT8G4SFS8266.C8FN 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 21.7
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL703VD Builds (Compare 518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL703VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback