Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 80.4 2-Core 156 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 376 41% 326 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 04CA) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.9% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 4.12 Parallax 1.41 2% 2.53 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.87 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.9% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 156 170 159 152 160 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 292 Write 261 Mixed 249 SusWrite 158 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 25.5 85% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 185 151% 212 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 0198 9905428-051.A00LF 8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.1 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1,266x
GeForce GT 525MNvidiaBench 2%, 9,032 samples	379x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	298x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	88x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 24%, 8,698 samples	68x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	51x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $228