Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive	288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200306
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '20 at 00:07
Run Duration	352 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 69.2 1-Core 157 2-Core 312 94% 180 Pts	4-Core 594 8-Core 1157 104% 876 Pts	64-Core 2,173 134% 2,173 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 93% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$35 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 420GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1355 981 998 989 991 991 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	288% Outstanding	Read 2,011 Write 2329 Mixed 1,772 SusWrite 1051 403% 1,791 MB/s	4K Read 52.5 4K Write 176 4K Mixed 78.3 273% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,436 DQ Write 1,224 DQ Mixed 1,315 990% 1,325 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 288% Great: 297%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164 35,257 User benchmarks, average bench 314% 927GB free Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3960 4037 4035 4008 4009 3989 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	495% Outstanding	Read 2,235 Write 3714 Mixed 2,305 SusWrite 4,006 697% 3,065 MB/s	4K Read 53.8 4K Write 222 4K Mixed 93.6 319% 123 MB/s	DQ Read 1,530 DQ Write 1,256 DQ Mixed 1,438 1,065% 1,408 MB/s
Poor: 182% ↑ This bench: 495% Great: 472%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 99GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 310 239 219 204 154 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 453 Mixed 390 SusWrite 265 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 88 4K Mixed 55.1 182% 62 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 166 133% 188 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 186GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 461 460 459 459 459 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 451 Mixed 409 SusWrite 460 102% 455 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 93.7 4K Mixed 57.9 190% 65 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 198 149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 192GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 300 300 300 301 301 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 451 Mixed 413 SusWrite 318 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 89.2 4K Mixed 55.4 184% 62.7 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 198 149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$222 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 89GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 188 172 153 141 129 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 178GB free Firmware: GG2OACY0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 82 83 83 82 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 72.8 Write 69.7 Mixed 29.1 SusWrite 81.1 46% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 84% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 58%
ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.5% Below average	Read 36.3 Write 35.3 Mixed 36.2 SusWrite 40 51% 37 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 1.2 235% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB 9,340 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.6% Very good	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 28.8 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 27.4 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 161%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 162%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI - $213

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	438x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $158Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	336x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	288x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	216x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	212x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	156x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	132x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	129x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	88x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	103x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $128Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	49x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,430

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16