To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime25.8 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 16:54
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 130
55% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 484
46% 379 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$239
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Lighting 97.4
Reflection 87.4
Parallax 82.7
79% 89.2 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 80
Splatting 77.5
73% 91.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme NE-512 512GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S062 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 378 320 411 526 495 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 668
Write 640
Mixed 461
SusWrite 360
119% 532 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 24.4
130% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 53
113% 225 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 251%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
66GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 74 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 65.3
Write 69.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 74.4
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 69%
Standard S-ATA Hard Drive 320GB
100GB free, PID 0731
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 82 84 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
Read 67.7
Write 65.5
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 83.1
88% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 33.3
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback