Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z390M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z390M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '20 at 14:58
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 90.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 271
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 741
79% 629 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
PNY(196E 1332) ≥ 4GB; PNY GTX 1660 OC
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 2005 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.5% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 18.6
58% 36.4 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 81
Splatting 3.48
37% 51 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 415 428 426 429 424 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 421
Mixed 407
SusWrite 417
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 31.4
103% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 290
235% 334 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 123%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 121 124 123 122 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 136
Write 103
Mixed 66
SusWrite 121
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 2.9
584% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 124 124 124 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 67.5
Write 111
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 123
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.3
244% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 68%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB
481GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 92 89 146 149 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
55% Above average
Read 152
Write 140
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 123
169% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
106% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55%
Great: 65%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
862GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 46 44 16 66 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
22% Poor
Read 47.7
Write 152
Mixed 98
SusWrite 46.2
127% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
78% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22%
Great: 70%
TOSHIBA HDWE140 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 0.9 17 119 81 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 138
Write 158
Mixed 60
SusWrite 55.6
133% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39%
Great: 70%
ST2000LX 001-1RG174 2TB
67GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.7 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.2% Very poor
Read 53.2
Write 75
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 2.6
73% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 23
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 20.6
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock Z390M-ITX/ac - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback