ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 0833A29

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 0833A29 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101021
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '17 at 13:31
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 74 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 55.3 37% 52.3 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 109 15% 109 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300 14,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E990) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.16% Terrible	Lighting 1.53 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.43 1% 1.19 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.16% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB 6,863 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 345GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 3582 (03) Spinup time 233 230 3308 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 607 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24783 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 509 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 46 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 560 (C2) HDA temperature 120 90 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 29	76.4% Very good	Read 136 Write 130 Mixed 21.9 69% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.06 4K Write 3.08 4K Mixed 0.53 160% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 80%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 282GB free, PID 0370 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.7% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 29.2 Mixed 29.6 38% 30 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.45 81% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.8 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 92.6 43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback