Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJun 22 '20 at 19:43
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 195
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 469
53% 415 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 82.6
55% 73.4 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 56.9
52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 437
Write 357
Mixed 283
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 17.6
70% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 48.4
DQ Write 64.3
DQ Mixed 39.9
35% 50.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 56%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
187GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 331 354 337 344 352 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 233
Write 329
Mixed 216
SusWrite 338
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 28.8
94% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 146
132% 198 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
532GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 101 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 154
Write 118
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 102
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HMRSK0002TBAT07K 2TB
385GB free
Firmware: MK7O3P01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 164 164 161 163 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 162
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 163
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 84%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
150GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 120 121 122 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 48.5
Write 66.5
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 121
56% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
147% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 66%
Verbatim Desktop HDD 3.0 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0415
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Read 25.7
Write 21.7
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 20
35% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 137 138 140 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 78.2
Write 80.2
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 138
110% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1632 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback