Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 105% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '20 at 17:38
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Memory 83.2 1-Core 109 2-Core 232 79% 142 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 866 79% 664 Pts	64-Core 1,218 75% 1,218 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 1474) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	120% Outstanding	Lighting 162 Reflection 185 Parallax 184 132% 177 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 165 Splatting 121 110% 135 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1274 309 314 313 309 315 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	178% Outstanding	Read 1,876 Write 1,309 Mixed 504 SusWrite 472 230% 1,040 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 65.4 4K Mixed 46.6 152% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 811 DQ Write 410 DQ Mixed 534 417% 585 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 236%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 646GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 11 11 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	34% Below average	Read 107 Write 85.8 Mixed 46 SusWrite 11.7 46% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 72% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 104%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 796GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 143 134 145 117 142 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 162 Write 165 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 137 96% 132 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 369% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 104%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 50TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	Read 81.2 Write 55 Mixed 49 SusWrite 2.7 35% 47 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 105%
Covecube Virtual Disk 55TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 48.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.3 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 86 Write 84.8 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 3.3 36% 48.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.2 71% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4BL.M16FE 2x16GB 766 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 43.6 MC Write 37 MC Mixed 38.8 114% 39.8 GB/s	SC Read 24.6 SC Write 41.5 SC Mixed 32.3 94% 32.8 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	421x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	205x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	218x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)