Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160223
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '17 at 02:53
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 89.6 1-Core 127 2-Core 253 87% 157 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 708 74% 594 Pts	64-Core 676 42% 676 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.4% Above average	Lighting 68.3 Reflection 66.8 Parallax 51.3 56% 62.2 fps	MRender 72 Gravity 70.6 Splatting 69.8 58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 480GB-$240 5,507 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 447GB free Firmware: SAFC12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (A2) Unknown 100 100 404 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2	79.3% Very good	Read 511 Write 346 Mixed 347 89% 402 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 70.1 4K Mixed 9.68 98% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 41.9 83% 167 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 100%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 800 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 48 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 23 (A3) Unknown 100 100 296 (94) Unknown 100 100 55200 (95) Unknown 100 100 775 (96) Unknown 100 100 686 (97) Unknown 100 100 746 (A4) Unknown 100 100 15854 (A5) Unknown 100 100 43 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 12 (A9) Unknown 100 100 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 48563936296994 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 90809 (F2) Unknown 100 100 63902 (F5) Unknown 100 100 93637 (F6) Unknown 100 100 110400 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	45.6% Average	Read 490 Write 30.1 Mixed 54.7 40% 192 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 45.5 4K Mixed 9.5 80% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 38 DQ Mixed 8.25 13% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 476GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896633013 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 52 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3254 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 47 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3157 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3157 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 236224774174 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	86.9% Excellent	Read 145 Write 159 Mixed 145 112% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.2 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 107%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	5.69% Terrible	Read 20.6 Write 7.46 Mixed 11.7 15% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 18% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.69% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB 4,792 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	74.9% Very good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 23.8 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 23.7 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z170-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 48%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 - $113

CPU
Core i5-6600KIntel $49Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	485x
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	441x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	196x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	239x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	180x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	118x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	74x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	56x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	50x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	58x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $44Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397