HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3398
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160513
Uptime124.1 Days
Run DateJun 20 '20 at 18:55
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770S CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 183
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 476
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 3398) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 372 367 376 371 383 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 392
Write 373
Mixed 256
SusWrite 373
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 26.2
87% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 63.7
DQ Mixed 70.8
56% 80.1 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 113%
WD My Passport 0748 2TB
87GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 24 27 27 25 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 14.2
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 24.5
28% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.8% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 USDT Builds (Compare 542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback