Today's hottest deals

Packard EasyNote TS11HR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote TS11HR  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV50_HR
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '20 at 19:16
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 122
56% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 314
32% 261 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0511) 1.8GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.69 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.74
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 388 402 396 399 397 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 391
Write 360
Mixed 348
SusWrite 392
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 16.3
77% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 33.9
81% 165 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 92%
Intenso Ultra Line 252GB
185GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 14 17 4.3 0.2 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 10.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 10.2
15% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
23% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TS11HR Builds (Compare 219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TS11HR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $183
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback