bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory140GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 140GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory136.7 GB free of 140 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '17 at 09:16
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
None, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 43.3
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 145
49% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 580
52% 438 Pts
64-Core 1,514
94% 1,514 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 1TB
980GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 43% Great: 94%
Virtual HD 136GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.28% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 10.3
Mixed 29.7
15% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.006
16% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.28%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 140GB
null MHz
512, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 11780 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 11.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback