Notebook N85_87HP6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook N85_87HP6  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N85_87HP6
Memory17.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180205
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 12:52
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 213
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 595
61% 493 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8503) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4614
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 71
Parallax 57.3
52% 64 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 56.5
Splatting 66.5
52% 63.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,799
Write 1,322
Mixed 566
270% 1,229 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 67.9
235% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1057
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 755
612% 871 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$55
244GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 80 85 85 80 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 50.8
Write 58.7
Mixed 56
SusWrite 80.3
46% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C14S4/16G 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.6% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 20.3
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 19.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N85_87HP6 Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook N85_87HP6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $377WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback