Hp-pavilion KX617AA-B1A m9345

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KX617AA-B1A m9345 (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080821
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '17 at 13:52
Run Duration	823 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38 10,428 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 27.3 2-Core 55 19% 41.2 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 103 14% 104 Pts	64-Core 88 5% 88 Pts
Poor: 35% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Asus(1043 84F0) 2GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Lighting 16.5 Reflection 14.6 Parallax 15.1 14% 15.4 fps	MRender 22.4 Gravity 18.3 Splatting 15.2 15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 29GB free Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3665 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 394 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 197 197 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 73 (C2) HDA temperature 76 59 176094642200 (F1) Unknown 100 100 92979	27.4% Poor	Read 247 Write 177 Mixed 181 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 6.18 4K Write 7.23 4K Mixed 4.56 19% 5.99 MB/s	DQ Read 21.6 DQ Write 18.7 DQ Mixed 11 11% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 95%
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76 9,139 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 4938 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 559 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1567852464747 (A6) Unknown 100 100 14 (A7) Unknown 100 100 10 (A8) Unknown 100 100 63 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 36 (AE) Unknown 100 100 83 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 71 47 201864642589 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 6622958323476 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 4183 (EA) Unknown 100 100 14027 (F1) Unknown 253 253 8089 (F2) Unknown 253 253 14214 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	22.2% Poor	Read 246 Write 74.4 Mixed 96.7 30% 139 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 8.88 4K Mixed 4.95 22% 7.11 MB/s	DQ Read 32.6 DQ Write 16.1 DQ Mixed 7.94 10% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 93%
Samsung S2 Portable 320GB 1,030 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 39GB free, PID 1f03 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 27 Mixed 26.9 35% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.24 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.31 52% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 21%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	9.5% Terrible	Read 28.3 Write 7.72 Mixed 21.2 22% 19.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.86 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.83 74% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.5% Great: 58%
CHIPSBNK v3.3.9.1 2GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 2093 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.4% Terrible	Read 27.1 Write 3.85 Mixed 6.53 12% 12.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.54 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 26% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.4% Great: 6%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 8GB 5,792 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 0GB free, PID 556b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	5% Terrible	Read 20.1 Write 3.22 Mixed 5.8 9% 9.71 MB/s	4K Read 2.04 4K Write 0.29 4K Mixed 0.66 40% 1 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 5% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% null MHz 2048, 1024, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.39% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.6 9% 3.23 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 1.1 3% 1.1 GB/s	Latency 510 8% 510 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.39% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion KX617AA-B1A m9345

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)