MSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics65.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '20 at 22:21
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 263
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 820
82% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,019
63% 1,019 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.08
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.9% Good
Lighting 83
Reflection 89.9
Parallax 79.8
68% 84.2 fps
MRender 82.2
Gravity 77.8
Splatting 71.2
62% 77.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 338 293 268 285 251 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 475
Mixed 359
SusWrite 301
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 56.3
183% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 294
222% 296 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 109%
Great: 134%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
37GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 344 291 268 162 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 484
Write 250
Mixed 283
SusWrite 251
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 27.4
106% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 145
120% 177 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 86%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
239GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 129 129 129 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 141
Write 138
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 129
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.9
204% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 100%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
419GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 87 86 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 59.5
Write 58.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 86.9
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST3250823AS 250GB-$99
80GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 59 62 61 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 52.3
Write 13.3
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 61.3
30% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 37%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
362GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 68 67 69 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 65.3
Write 63.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 67.2
80% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 43%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 500GB
356GB free, PID ab05
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 100 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 95.5
Write 91
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 99.6
109% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M4B3000C15 CMK16GX4M4C3000C16 CMK16GX4M4B3000C15 CMK16GX4M4C3000C16 CMK16GX4M4B3000C15 CMK16GX4M4C3000C16 CMK16GX4M4B3000C15 CMK16GX4M4C3000C16 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 40.1
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 23.2
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 107%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885) - $289

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $1,014
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback