TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Studio XPS 7100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Studio XPS 7100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0FF3FN
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100910
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJul 09 '15 at 09:17
Run Duration719 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 104
35% 78 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 277
30% 236 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 46% Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5870
AMD(1002 0B00) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 17% Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 77
Write 80.3
Mixed 63.3
55% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.21
78% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 45.2%
 Great: 70%
RIM BlackBerry 6GB
6GB free, PID null
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Read 14
Write 4.83
Mixed 11.1
12% 10 MB/s
4K Read 2.25
4K Write 0.08
4K Mixed 0.06
13% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.85%
 Great: 5%
RIM BlackBerry SD 2GB
2GB free, PID null
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Read 7.64
Write 3.58
Mixed 4.77
6% 5.33 MB/s
4K Read 1.93
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.02
9% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 2.44%
 Great: 3%
Verbatim STORE N GO 4GB
1GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Read 13.1
Write 2.82
Mixed 4.65
7% 6.87 MB/s
4K Read 3.13
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.02
14% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 3.38%
 Great: 6%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Studio XPS 7100 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 7100

CPU
Phenom II X6 1035TAMDBench 53%, 2,528 samples20x
Phenom II X6 1045TAMD  $165Bench 54%, 5,709 samples13x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD  $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples12x
GPU
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples11x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples4x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples4x
SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples2x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk  $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples2x
RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples4x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GBMicronBench 36%, 8 samples4x
M378B5773CH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 1,752 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback