ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	8.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-G (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '15 at 16:23
Run Duration	103 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 111 2-Core 203 72% 157 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 622 63% 513 Pts	64-Core 613 38% 613 Pts
Poor: 58% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000D 1,102 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Nvidia(10DE 096F) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.5306 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	8.05% Terrible	Lighting 9.33 Reflection 8.5 Parallax 10.2 8% 9.34 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 8.47 Splatting 11.8 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.05% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mknssdcr 480GB 480GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 298GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 21057340 (05) Reallocated sector count 96 96 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 -50818053044049 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 424 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 183 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 43 57 55838310443 (C2) HDA temperature 43 57 55838310443 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 21057340 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 21057340 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 21057340 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 12884901888 (E9) Unknown 0 0 7457 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1488 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1488 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2507	46.2% Average	Read 504 Write 193 Mixed 152 62% 283 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 8.83 4K Mixed 10.3 36% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 91.4 DQ Write 42.4 DQ Mixed 28.8 32% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 899GB free Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 83340632 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1040 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 197899 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2215 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 409 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 61 589299744 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 35 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3332 (C2) HDA temperature 32 40 47244640288 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -85774791868378 (F1) Unknown 100 253 14285662 (F2) Unknown 100 253 46696337	86.7% Excellent	Read 152 Write 150 Mixed 154 115% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.39 120% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	976x
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	795x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	542x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	482x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	409x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	373x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	262x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	165x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	158x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	159x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	130x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $317

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback