Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 11 '20 at 22:18
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 178
62% 111 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 498
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 24
13% 18.3 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 19.5
14% 15.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X02c08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 274 79 30 31 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 413
Write 366
Mixed 340
SusWrite 135
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 33.3
118% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 186
141% 185 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
779GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 179 181 182 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 172
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 180
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 10.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.8
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback